Weider Nutrition Agrees to Settle FTC Charges
of Unsubstantiated Claims for Dietary Supplements

FTC News Release
October 5, 2000

Weider Nutrition International, Inc., based in Salt Lake City, Utah, has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it made unsubstantiated efficacy and safety claims in its advertisements for dietary supplement products called "PhenCal" and "PhenCal 106." The ads claim that PhenCal and PhenCal 106 (collectively, "PhenCal") were proven to cause weight loss and to prevent the regaining of lost weight. Under the terms of the proposed consent agreement, Weider would be required to pay $400,000 to the FTC for consumer redress. In addition, Weider must possess competent and reliable scientific evidence when it makes any weight loss, safety, disease benefit, or comparative claim in the promotion of its products or programs.

Weider is a leading manufacturer and marketer of nutritional supplements, vitamins and sports nutrition products. Weider sold PhenCal as an alternative to a combination of prescription diet drugs (phentermine and fenfluramine) commonly known as "Phen-Fen."

Weider advertised in major newspapers across the United States. Its newspaper ads touted PhenCal as a safe alternative to diet drugs: "YOU NO LONGER NEED TO CHOOSE BETWEEN THE DANGERS OF BEING OVERWEIGHT AND THE DANGERS OF DIET DRUGS." The ads also contained express claims that PhenCal's efficacy and safety have been clinically proven with statements such as: "Proven Safe Without a Prescription" and "Proven: Effective as Prescription Treatments." In its promotional brochure, Weider compared PhenCal to Phen-Fen and made similar claims that scientific studies proved PhenCal's efficacy and safety.

According to the FTC's complaint, Weider did not have a reasonable basis to substantiate its claims that PhenCal and PhenCal 106:

The complaint further alleges that Weider's claims that scientific studies prove that PhenCal is effective and safe are false.

The proposed consent agreement, announced today for public comment, would prohibit Weider from making the specific unsubstantiated claims alleged in the complaint. The proposed settlement also would require Weider, when advertising any food, drug, dietary supplement, or program, to have adequate scientific evidence before making claims relating to:

In addition, the proposed settlement would prohibit Weider from misrepresenting the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions or interpretations of any test, study or research. The settlement would allow Weider to make claims on labels for drugs or other products that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

Further, the proposed settlement would require the respondent to pay $400,000 to the Commission. The funds will be used for consumer redress or, if that is impractical, the funds will be paid to the US Treasury.

Finally, the settlement contains various recordkeeping provisions designed to assist the FTC in monitoring the respondent's compliance.

The Commission vote to accept the proposed consent agreement for public comment was 5-0.

Related Documents:

Links to Recommended Companies